Tee-hee.

nah
As you see, Erivan created this site with a group of asshol*s from my school, in my school the period is integral and we make a course of Administration of Network... They not ever asked me to join them, and people understand about my knowledge... So, is this site vulnerable? It seems to use a base-html from any "create a social wire tutorial"... :v

Dudutxsuio wrote:

nah
As you see, Erivan created this site with a group of asshol*s from my school, in my school the period is integral and we make a course of Administration of Network... They not ever asked me to join them, and people understand about my knowledge... So, is this site vulnerable? It seems to use a base-html from any "create a social wire tutorial"... :v

There's a sign up button in the top left corner. Why not just sign up instead of being pissy?

Maverick wrote:

There's a sign up button in the top left corner. Why not just sign up instead of being pissy?

Dudutxsuio wrote:

nah
As you see, Erivan created this site with a group of asshol*s from my school, in my school the period is integral and we make a course of Administration of Network... They not ever asked me to join them, and people understand about my knowledge... So, is this site vulnerable? It seems to use a base-html from any "create a social wire tutorial"... :v

Forum Rules
Do not attempt to harm Logical Gamers or any of its members in any mental or physical way.

1. I feel like informing you of this site's vulnerability would put it's safety in jeopardy.
2. I feel like informing you of it's vulnerability would be violating the rules.
3. I feel like you asking for the status of the site's current vulnerability is in violation of the rules.
4. If you were as good as you claim to be (at least I believe you were claiming to be good from that gibberish above), you would have already found out for yourself.

Nice try though.

Just PM me. I'll give you my skype, and we can conduct business off-site.

niicholai wrote:

Forum Rules
Do not attempt to harm Logical Gamers or any of its members in any mental or physical way.

1. I feel like informing you of this site's vulnerability would put it's safety in jeopardy.
2. I feel like informing you of it's vulnerability would be violating the rules.
3. I feel like you asking for the status of the site's current vulnerability is in violation of the rules.
4. If you were as good as you claim to be (at least I believe you were claiming to be good from that gibberish above), you would have already found out for yourself.

Nice try though.

He is talking about some other forum, for which I removed the link, because ads and stuff.

GAMEchief wrote:

He is talking about some other forum, for which I removed the link, because ads and stuff.

Oh, ok. I thought he was actually stupid enough to ask members of this site what the vulnerability status of the site was lol. My bad.

Vulnerability status: invulnerable
Source: me, the guy who vulnerabilated the fuck out of it and then invulnerabilated the fuck out of it

GAMEchief wrote:

Vulnerability status: invulnerable
Source: me, the guy who butt fucked the shit out of it and then made sweet tender love to it

fixed

Eerily similar to how I treat my partners.

GAMEchief wrote:

Eerily similar to how I treat my partners.

You too?

niicholai wrote:

Forum Rules
Do not attempt to harm Logical Gamers or any of its members in any mental or physical way.

1. I feel like informing you of this site's vulnerability would put it's safety in jeopardy.
2. I feel like informing you of it's vulnerability would be violating the rules.
3. I feel like you asking for the status of the site's current vulnerability is in violation of the rules.
4. If you were as good as you claim to be (at least I believe you were claiming to be good from that gibberish above), you would have already found out for yourself.

Nice try though.

People actually read the site rules? I've never even glanced at them.

Me neither.

We have site rules?

The Unintelligible wrote:

People actually read the site rules? I've never even glanced at them.

He's only one I've ever seen actually bother. Almost every post of his is quoting some rule or condemning a user for breaking some rule nobody really cared about.

Drakonid wrote:

We have site rules?

In the wild west of LG the only law is the one you make.